| The current cost-price squeeze
has growers searching for ways to lower costs without
affecting income. The trouble is, few such opportunities
exist, beyond tightening up operations here and there.
Art Bowman, Modesto-area Blue Diamond grower and partner
in Salida Ag Chem, says it all when he advises, "Remember,
in tough times, optimum quality and production are what
carry you through."
According to Bowman, members of Blue Diamond have a
unique opportunity to maximize income through participation
in the High Quality Grower Meat Program. Nonpareil grower
meats that qualified earned as much as 14 cents over
the base price for that variety for 2000 crop. To qualify
for the quality meat program, a shipment has to meet
specifications in four critical categories.
"If you want to earn top dollar for your almonds,
you want the best crop you can get," Bowman says.
"That means good nutrition and pest control. There
are no shortcuts."
"I tell my growers that when they choose not to
make an input or perform a cultural operation, they
have to accept the risk that they may not meet the requirements
for the quality premiums," he adds. Delivering
high-quality product not only earns a grower a significant
amount of money above the base price, but also helps
make Blue Diamond more efficient, which leads to higher
grower returns.
Bowman acknowledges that his interest in Salida Ag
Chem may make his cultural advice seem a bit biased,
but he points out that he follows his own recommendations.
"I'm not changing any of my cultural practices
this year," he says. But he also keeps a tight
rein on every operation at his ranch. "I make sure
that we don't waste any of our inputs," he explains.
"And that is my advice to anyone who wants to minimize
their costs."
Mel Machado, Blue Diamond field supervisor in the Modesto
area, says: "A grower must know his costs. Then
he can cut the cost of the input that returns the least."
He suggests determining the cost of each thing you do
on a per-acre basis, which can be easily translated
to a per-pound number. "You could, for example,
cut your fertilizer program because it's a big cost,
but it has a high return," he explains. "On
the other hand, you could reduce the number of mowings,
a comparatively low cost operation, but it also returns
relatively little."
Conservative Management
When it comes to tree nutrition, Bowman strongly recommends
using tissue, water and soil analyses "to make
sure that what you give your trees is what they need.
You want to make sure that the food they receive is
in proper balance." Your irrigation water may have
substantial amounts of nitrogen and potassium in it,
which reduces the amount you have to buy to meet the
needs of your trees, he says. "Snowmelt water,
which some of our irrigation districts supply, doesn't
have nitrates in it, but pump water usually does. I've
seen significant levels of nitrates in groundwater,"
he adds.
You don't need to have a soil analysis done every year,
he says, but do it often enough to maintain a baseline
of data on the chemical compounds in the root zone.
He recommends conducting the soil, water and tissue
tests in June or July "so you have a common reference
point."
The importance of these analyses cannot be overstated,
he says, because in his years of experience advising
growers he's found that growers tend to over-apply nitrogen
and under-apply potassium. Bringing those two back into
balance is often just an exchange of dollars: savings
from using less nitrogen largely offsets the cost of
the extra potassium. This adjustment produces a bonus
- improved health and performance of the trees.
"Potassium helps trees be more efficient users
of nitrogen and water, which are essential in the translocation
of sugars and starch formation," Bowman explains.
"It encourages root growth and helps build plant
resistance to disease."
Some of Bowman's customers tissue test every month
to make sure they are keeping their nutrients at the
UC Guidelines levels. "They apply nitrogen gradually
through their drip lines," he explains, "and
are more efficient and use less nitrogen in the long
run than if they put it on just a few times a year."
Cutting It Close
Sometimes you can't do something no matter how much
you would like to, so you do what you can and plan to
make it up later. You may not like the consequences,
but that is the best you can do under the circumstances.
"If a grower is strapped for cash, he may have
to reduce his nitrogen inputs or skip them altogether
for a season," Bowman says. "Databases of
year-to-year tissue analyses indicate that an almond
tree that is in good shape may go a year without added
nitrogen and continue to produce a crop, but that missed
nitrogen will have to be replaced in the future."
"If tissue sampling shows that your trees are
in good shape and your soil pH is in balance, you may
be able to back off your usual nutrition program a little,
but don't let things get out of balance," he advises.
"It is unwise to allow your trees to become deficient
in any nutrient. Remember, zinc and boron are very important."
Growers who may be thinking about cutting back on nitrogen
should keep their tissue analyses above 21/2 percent,
he says. "If they go below that, they could reduce
the size of their current crop and jeopardize the following
year's bloom and nut load."
Pest Control
To save money in pest control, a grower can help himself
a lot by paying close attention to detail, says Bowman.
"Know your pest exposure, which pests are a problem
in your area. Don't treat for something needlessly.
Ask a PCA for advice. His services are cheaper than
an unnecessary treatment."
For additional savings, a grower has to take a step
back in technology, he says. "The soft, environmentally
friendly products cost more than the conventional materials.
It's a tough decision."
Citing an Almond Board sponsored study of three different
pest control programs, Bowman noted that the standard
chemical-based program consistently produced results
at less cost than the "soft" material program
- by some $20-plus dollars per acre. But, of course,
there are downsides to using such materials.
"The most efficient material for worm control
may be the synthetic pyrethroids (Asana, Ambush, Pounce),
but these products entail environmental concerns and
could lead to high spider mite populations," he
explains. "Then, one of the best materials to control
spider mites is Agrimek, but it is expensive."
Make It Clean
The best approach overall, is to begin early with orchard
sanitation, he suggests. "Orchard sanitation is
the cheapest and most efficient way to control navel
orange worm. It's far more efficient than hull-split
applications."
"My experience is that if your goal is to get
into the quality meat program, you need to perform at
least two of the four possible worm control operations
during the year: dormant control, bloom spray, May timing
spray, and hull-split spray," he says. "Do
two of those, along with orchard sanitation, and you
have reasonable assurance of getting into the premium
program."
Don't bother trying to shave costs by skipping rows,
he says. "In my opinion, you are better off not
doing something than trying half measures." And
forget speeding up the spray rig to reduce the amount
of material used. "You want good applications;
you want control; you want the best crop you can get,"
he says. The premium more than makes up for the difference
in inputs.
Make Everything Count
"These are the toughest times on the farm that
I've ever seen," says Bowman. "But I have
a 20-year investment in trees and I have to ride it
out. I can't be jumping into something else, so I'm
looking at ways to make my operation as efficient as
possible. I'm looking at everything. Do I need that
extra tractor? Or that extra man year-round, or could
I use a labor contractor now and then to pick up the
slack? There's no one thing a grower can do to make
it come out right. You have to scrutinize everything."
|